Tuesday, April 3, 2012

Old Charlie's post2


It’s high time to come back to my BlogSpot for a second post, taking advantage from some friends’ remarks: the first point is why to address ourselves only to Parkinson affected people?

We are part of a multifarious universe of differently afflicted individuals; indeed everybody on earth is moving toward her or his very personal death and behind this only too obvious acknowledgment what the duce remains to be said to encourage our poor fellows? Can we devise a message that can help anybody to live a somewhat better life in the meanwhile? Are we perhaps pursuing what Henri Bergson[1] called momentary anesthesia of the heart, through some sophisticated form of wit?

Well, in factbased on my personal experience, I had started with the idea to make easier specially the burden of my Parkinson afflicted colleagues, keeping them in high spirits - as far as possible - by means of humorous anecdotes revolving on our peculiar propensity to fall with our face on the ground and make a fuss everywhere through the irrepressible tremor of our hands.

This is why I posted my first blog piece here but sure it’s right to say that not only the Parkinson sick is in need of solace and comfort.

Thus this blog of mine ought to become something of universal purport. The inspiration comes from a club of handicapped youth, not far from my home. They are still too young to be victim of Parkinsonism: it is some other variety of illness that constrains them to move on a wheelchair. At times I am joining someone of their group to have a drink in the bar of their association and sometimes we joke about the way “normally walking people” call us “differently able” types. We have our own kind of fun. Lately I have been called, by some of these young wheeled friends, not an old person and neither a decrepit fellow but … a differently young man!  I am fond of these new friends who enjoy frolic and would probably welcome pages written by a jester story teller like me. Thus I feel confirmed in my calling vocation, directed to each and every soul waiting for it, independently from the type of her or his ailment
 
Let me commence in a rather dull way, since stupidity is where I succeed best. (You know, to avoid calling someone stolid, you can say differently clever)  So: in which corner of our psyche do we humans find most of fun? What is that in our innermost drives us to laugh? Is it true that when you chuckle you are inclined to laugh off, i.e. disregard, brush aside and shrug off concerns, woes, worries and anxiety – at least for a while? Hmm!

Until recently I believed Arthur Koestler to be outstanding for his “Darkness at Noon”, then after discovering in the Encyclopaedia Britannica an article of his about humor[2]

If you manage to read it, you’ll enjoy the whole of it, starting from the very explanation of how and why fun is rooted in the story of the marquis of the court of Louis XV who unexpectedly returned from a journey and, on entering his wife's boudoir, found her in the arms of a bishop (here is the tension that waits to be relieved). After a moment's hesitation, the marquis walked calmly to the window, leaned out, and began going through the motions of blessing the people in the street  (here you begin to suspect where the relief of tension is coming from).

It’s like a click of the Geiger counter indicating the presence of radioactivityTo produce the comic effect you must compel the reader to perceive the situation in two self-consistent but incompatible frames of reference at the same time; his mind has to operate simultaneously on two different wavelengths … When a comedian tells a story, he deliberately sets out to create a certain tension in his listeners, which mounts as the narrative progresses. But it never reaches its expected climax. The punch line acts as a verbal guillotine that cuts across the logical development of the story; it debunks the audience's dramatic expectations. The tension that is felt becomes suddenly redundant and is exploded in laughter. Simple, huh?

Here we have, as Koestler notes, an odd mechanism of reflex quite unrelated to the struggle for survival: no comparison with motor reflexes, such as the contraction of the pupil of the eye in dazzling light, that are simple responses to simple stimuli whose value to survival is obvious. Laughter is a reflex but unique in that it has no apparent biological purpose.

One might call it a luxury reflex. Its only function seems to be to provide relief from tension, and it plays a subtle role with aggressiveness. On the other hand, psychologist William MacDougall believed that “laughter has been evolved in the human race as an antidote to sympathy, a protective reaction shielding us from the depressive influence of the shortcomings of our fellow men”.

Be it as it may, here I’m going to give you a taste of humorous anecdotes of mine, i.e. a brief history of tension-and-relief on occasion of our last year’s trip in France.

Let me be sincere with you, friends. I don’t feel to be an unlucky fellow. So no strong tension is building up— in the early stages of the process.

First of all, Hildegard’s health and spirits are as good as ever, and that is the most important bliss. In the second place, I am not yet - and perhaps won’t be for a while - completely crippled. I can walk some ten meters with the help of a stick and only seldom indeed I fall ruinously with my face on the ground and need the help of at least a pair of robust people to regain my vertical standing.


And then I can still drive my glorious Punto car and that’s the most delightful gift of all. Forget any airplane trip, with the handbags to be agonizingly dragged around! My car is quite the thing needed to reach many a place in continental Europe.

I can easily drive up to 1,000 kilometres a day, just crawling out of the car for a few moments when I need to visit restrooms, restaurants and fuel stations. That’s marvel­lous, undeniably. And so I am going to report here my last trip to Paris on last July, to make clear how humor is driven by tension-and-relief.

The opportunity was given by an engagement of my daughter Carla, the physician, who was expected to lecture at a conference of geriatric doctors up there in those days. My daughter’s son, Fabio (who just finished his primary school this summer) was eager to join his mother in Paris as a prize for his promotion, so Hildegard & I proposed to be ourselves in the Ville Lumière on the same days, to keep the boy happy during the hours in which his mother would be busy with her geriatric audience. And so we did. When the young couple arrived in the Novotel at the Défense after a night sleeping on the TGV train from Torino, we, the old couple, were already there waiting for their arrival after a 930-km drive on the previous day. (Torino - called Turin in English - where we live, is the capital city of Piedmont, Italy’s north-western region bordering on France and Switzerland just beyond the Alps).
I had enjoyed every moment of that trip, first through the alpine mountains and then through the lovely French countryside. I was a bit less pleased with the time we spent in Paris, because we had to go around in the Metro and the stairs down and up the underground system are not the most desirable exer­cise for a half crippled old lad. However, I had also some long moments of rest on a wooden bench near the Tour Eiffel, where I sat immobile a couple of hours waiting for the return of Hildegard and the boy from the top of it, and then my glutei were thoroughly flattened and hardened for the remaining hours of the day. We had some abrupt cloudburst showers in those days, and found refuge in various cafés and bistros, as well as navigating on the Seine on the very same Bateaux Mouche we had appreciated many decades ago when we were young— Paris is never disappointing, always the same charming enchantment.

In the late afternoon of the third day our dear guests took the train to return to Torino, thus Hildegard and I had a last chance to have a good time in the evening, alone by our­selves, as we had some 55 years ago, and on many an occasion later. We both remembered a good place for oysters close to Place de la Bastille, but we were unsure whether the huitres were still served there: and surely the walk from Châtelet along rue de Rivoli and St. Antoine seemed incredibly longer than we remembered it to be. I trudged grasping Hildegard’s arm and every now and then had to stop leaning against a wall for a long while.

So we arrived very late at that posh restaurant, and seeing the huge crowd queuing up at the inner barrier where the service staff allotted the seating places, Hildegard proposed to take a taxi at once and go back to our hotel at the Défence. But I wasn’t sure that we would ever return to Paris, and addressing myself very privately to an old wise-looking senior waiter,  I confessed to being René-la-canne (a renowned French racket­eer just discharged in those days from prison with his con­spicuous orthopaedic stick and sun-glasses, as he appeared on the evening paper of that day) and said that I had wanted for years to taste again their excellent oysters and putting in his hand a wad of Euro bills, I suggested we could bypass both the cloak-room and the staff barrier— so he guided us through a “personnel only” door and we arrived in the dining room, in­credibly full of properly dressed people and baroque mirrors. 


Our dripping umbrellas and wet rain jackets were looked at disapprovingly by our neighbors at the near table, and I felt a scornful glance darted by the lady sitting on the long wall-seat near me, when I awkwardly, unwittingly pushed my umbrella right in her soft flesh, while trying to settle myself down at the table with my stick and umbrella. Hildegard felt a bit embar­rassed by all this, and by the fact that I ordered an enormous quantity (two dozens) of the largest oysters – while she was content with a simple onion soup.

But this was only the beginning of her apprehensions: the wine was an excellent Chablis that pleasantly warmed up my brain neurons (what’s left of them) and while I was eagerly confirming my “Carpe Diem” philosophy to my wife, a most intense tremor moved my hand out of its trajectory and I over­turned the glass and the divine wine was poured on the pre­cious Flanders table cloth and, what is worse, abundantly sprinkled the naked right leg of the prim lady near me. We were in July but the unrequired refreshment did not seem to be welcomed by her – and in fact she started to shriek like a goose plucked alive.

I felt ashamed and confused and overwhelmed and in the total irrationality of the moment I bent down to wipe her right calf with my left hand— what a horrible moment, dear friends!

The whole hall was filled by the lady’s screams, I re­member confusedly a squad of waiters guided by the maître, all equipped with towels of various sizes to dry up the table cloth, while a super-maître was humbly apologizing to the neurotic husband of the neurotic lady and gazing at me with terrible eyes - oh boys, you can imagine how much I wanted to disap­pear. The adrenaline level in my blood could hardly be higher, no relief for my inside tension was possibly in sight.  
In point of fact, I have a sort of black-out in my memory (probably the benevolent Gods grant us, for such painful mo­ments, some sort of trance). I only remember being accompanied with Hildegard at the back door on a narrow dark alley by a by-no-means-loqua­cious man who strongly recommended that we should  keep away from the main entrance and tète-de-taxi, so we walked as unnoticed as possible to the Metro station down at Place de la Bastille.
Hildegard, who had not been in a trance during those dramatic minutes, told me, when finally we sat in the Metro carriage, that apparently the furious husband was a functionary at the police headquarters in Quai des Orfèvres and probably the idea of impersonating René-la-canne was not quite the best choice. We even noticed too late that there is direct Metro line from Défence to Bastille, so we could have been spared that terrible, long and time-consuming walk on rue de Rivoli!

The following day was a bright, lovely day. On our way home I pulled up to have lunch at Beaune, the picturesque capital city of Bourgogne, where I was lucky stumbling against my own stick right while going into the restaurant (so I could never be sus­pected of falling on the ground because I had drunk too much!) and there I enjoyed a fantastic dozen of escargots à la bour­guignonne duly accompanied by a bottle of Châteauneuf du Pape and in the relaxing atmosphere of the cosy place I asked Hildegard which had been her best moment in those three-and-a-half days in France.

She said: <The moment that I felt I was your moll, Carlo>

<Moll?>

<Yes!! At the age of seventy eight I eventually was be­ing looked at as “the moll of the gangster” – quite an exciting experience> … and a text-book example of tension relief.






Carletto Scara














[1] Actually Bergson was meaning the absence of sympathy with the victim of a joke
[2]
Britannica style:
"humour."Ecyclopædia Britannica from Encyclopædia Britannica 2006 Ultimate Reference Suite DVD .[Accessed April 2, 2012].

No comments:

Post a Comment